Re: Tut Tut...
- From: Tony Raven <junk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 20:16:09 +0100
TheMgt wrote on 30/06/2007 20:04 +0100:
Rob Morley wrote:In article <1a2hi.13637$p8.1018@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, TheMgt themgt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...Rob Morley wrote:I wouldn't hit them if I could help it
I just don't understand why motorists feel obliged to let them through when they're blatantly running red lightsWould you really hit someone, injuring them and probably causing several
hundred quids worth of damage to your car, when you could just brake
and swear a lot instead?
And neither would almost anyone else. They don't really have time to
think about it, they just reflexively brake and steer. It's not until
the bike's past that they've time to get angry and shouty.
Even the ones here claiming they would are I would bet all mouth and no trousers if it came to it.
--
Tony
"The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there is no good evidence either way."
- Bertrand Russell
.
- References:
- Tut Tut...
- From: The other view point, there is one you know...
- Re: Tut Tut...
- From: Marc Brett
- Re: Tut Tut...
- From: Mark
- Re: Tut Tut...
- From: Rob Morley
- Re: Tut Tut...
- From: TheMgt
- Re: Tut Tut...
- From: Rob Morley
- Re: Tut Tut...
- From: TheMgt
- Tut Tut...
- Prev by Date: Re: Tut Tut...
- Next by Date: Re: 1984 Moulton AM7 question
- Previous by thread: Re: Tut Tut...
- Next by thread: Re: Tut Tut...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|