Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Rob Morley <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:42:41 +0100
In article <5enbonF3a6sn0U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nick
Spam@xxxxxxxx says...
Rob Morley wrote:
Except that banned drivers often continue to drive, repeatedly catching
The good thing about prolonged driving bans are that they help prevent
recidivism and that they don't cost the tax payer.
them and putting them through the courts costs money, supervising their
community service costs money ...
Yes I agree at some point prison may be required if they do ignore a ban.
I'm not sure what your point is
I was disagreeing with you on both of your points.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Nick
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- References:
- [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Tony Raven
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Simon Brooke
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: raisethe
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Nick
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Rob Morley
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Nick
- [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- Prev by Date: Re: 1984 Moulton AM7 question
- Next by Date: Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- Previous by thread: Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|