Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: W.Warburton@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:18:07 -0700
On 27 Jun, 20:22, Simon Brooke <s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No, there /isn't/. As Ian Smith rightly points out, the kids who can't go
freely about their affairs, who can't visit their friends without
supervision, who can't play in the street; and the old and infirm who
become trapped in their houses, are just as much victims of speeding as
the people who are injured and killed.
That's cars, not "speeding".
If we want to live our lives like that we arn't going to achieve it
simply by capping the speed cars travel at, are we?
Cheers,
W.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: Simon Brooke
- Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- References:
- Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: Marc Brett
- Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: fred
- Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: Peter Clinch
- Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: The other view point, there is one you know...
- Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: Alistair Gunn
- Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: Simon Brooke
- Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: W . Warburton
- Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: Simon Brooke
- Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: Peter Clinch
- Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: Simon Brooke
- Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- Prev by Date: Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- Next by Date: Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- Previous by thread: Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- Next by thread: Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|