Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: W.Warburton@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 01:48:30 -0700
Hi,
How come those people feel unable to "make progess" whilst remaining
within the speed limit?
On 26 Jun, 20:37, Simon Brooke <s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's like being unable to do your shopping in Tesco's without shoplifting.
No, it's not. If you steal something from Tesco then it costs them
money, they are the victim. Speeding, in itself, is a victimless
crime. Even driving irresponsibly is victimless until something goes
wrong.
I completely agree that driving irresponsibly should be a crime, but
it is ciminal because of the risks it places on other people (like
randomly discharging a shotgun, as has been highlighted elsewhere in
this thread). Shoplifting always has a victim.
People know that they are unlikely to hurt anyone if they speed,
especially if they do so responsibly(!). That's different from
stealing.
Cheers,
W.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: Simon Brooke
- Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- References:
- Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: Marc Brett
- Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: fred
- Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: Peter Clinch
- Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: The other view point, there is one you know...
- Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: Alistair Gunn
- Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- From: Simon Brooke
- Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- Prev by Date: Re: A bad start to my Sunday....
- Next by Date: Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- Previous by thread: Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- Next by thread: Re: Law-abiding majority 'is a myth'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|